| |
Message from the Co-Chairs
With about 2,000 abstracts received, the ASLO 2005 Summer Meeting
in Santiago de Compostela will be the largest meeting in the society’s
history, exceeding by about 50 percent (50%) the average size of
ASLO meetings, as well as the pioneer meeting in Europe (Copenhagen
2000). In addition to this impressive number of participants, the
contingent that will gather in Santiago de Compostela represents
a much broader representation of the world community in Aquatic
Sciences, with participants from 50 countries (Table
1), compared
to the 20 represented in most ASLO meetings. Concerns that the
scheduling of two meetings, a winter meeting in Salt lake City
(USA) and a summer one in Santiago de Compostela, would deter from
participation in either one proved unsupported, as the Salt Lake
City meeting gathered 1,200 participants.
We believe that the enthusiastic response to the Santiago ASLO
2005 Summer Meeting in terms of number of participants, as well
as in their worldwide distribution, provides a clear message for
the demand of high-quality aquatic sciences meetings, which ASLO
excels on, outside as well as inside North America. Moreover, a
record high of 1057 new members registered on the wake of the ASLO
2005 meetings, and the retention of these new, largely international,
members in the society poses a challenge to ASLO, requiring the
provision of services, such as meetings, to these members. The
usual number of members is approximately 100-200 per year. The
ASLO Board and the society’s President are, fortunately,
well aware of these challenges (cf. L&O Bulletin 14: 3-4, 2005).
While all involved are delighted with the massive attendance expected
to the event, it has certainly posed a challenge to the Planning
Committee and the Business Office, as our expectations, based on
previous meetings, were set at about 50 percent (50 %) lower participation
than realized. The Business Office and Planning Committee made
all possible efforts to expand the space and time available for
parallel oral presentations, increasing the number of oral slots
possible by about eighty percent (80 %). Even this number could
not accommodate the great demand for oral slots, so that, with
the advice of the session co-chairs, about twenty-five percent
(25 %) of the presentations were transferred to posters. We thank
participants who suggested oral but were assigned to poster presentations
for their good spirit and understanding, which we planned to correspond
to by highlighting the poster session.
To this end, we created three poster sessions (one per day), with
the posters being replaced each day, thereby holding, at any one
poster session, the minimum possible number of posters (about 240).
The poster session has been given prime time by following the plenary
lectures and developing over two hours before the start of the
parallel sessions. Provided the number of participants, the number
of posters, and the time available to examine the posters, we calculate
that the average attention to posters will be about 1,000 participant-minutes
(e.g. 100 participants spending 10 min. each at any one poster)
at the poster session itself (the posters will be exhibited for
a full day). This will allow for ample interactions, as all visitors
to a poster will have the opportunities to pose questions or gather
additional information from the author. A similar calculation indicates
that, on average, about 150 participants will attend each oral
presentation, but the limited time for question periods (5 min.
at most) implies that only 3 to 4 of them will have the opportunity
to interact (pose questions) with each speaker during the time
allotted. Clearly, these calculations indicate that posters offer
far greater opportunities to meet and interact with participants
than oral sessions do.
We then made all possible efforts to arrange oral sessions in
the most logical manner possible, provided the large number (12)
of concurrent sessions. Our aim was to create clusters of thematically-related
sessions so as to avoid that oral presentations of similar topics
would compete for participants’ attention at any one time,
and that participants would have to run from room to room to follow
the thread of their thematic interest during the sessions. Each
of these clusters will have a dedicated room where the sessions
composing the cluster will be run along the entire week. The cluster
concept will also be used in grouping the posters, so that thematically
linked posters will be clustered in space in the exhibition hall.
The Planning Committee has proposed 12 session clusters, which
encompass all of the abstracts submitted:
- Microbial Biodiversity and Ecology
- Functional Role of Biodiversity
- Ocean Processes
- Continental and Coastal Processes
- Biogeochemistry
- Global and Climate Change
- Applied Ecosystem Research
- Metabolism and Stoichiometry
- Perspectives and Frontiers
- Concepts, Theories, and Approaches
- Plankton: Communities and Life History
- Planktonic processes
At the same time, the number of plenary talks has greatly increased
compared to previous ASLO meetings, from 3 plenary talks to 7 plenary
talks, including exciting scientific presentations by the ASLO
President, and the 2005 ASLO Awards recipients (cf. L&O Bulletin
14:15-17, 2005). All in all, the program contained in this volume
depicts the broadest possible conception of aquatic sciences and
the excellence and frontier traits of the research that are the
trademarks of ASLO. We believe that each of you will find many
stimulating abstracts, and that your attendance to this meeting
will positively impact on your own research and the development
of interactions and partnerships within the aquatic sciences research
community.
We wish you a safe trip to Santiago de Compostela and an enjoyable
meeting.
Carlos M. Duarte and Emilio Fernández
ASLO 2005 Summer Meeting Co-Chairs, on behalf of the Planning Committee
Table 1.
The breakdown by country of the registered participants
submitting an abstract to the ASLO 2005 Summer Meeting in Santiago
de Compostela, Spain.
| Country |
Count |
|
Country |
Count |
| USA |
529 |
|
Slovenia |
8 |
| Spain |
293 |
|
Croatia |
7 |
| Germany |
160 |
|
China |
6 |
| France |
143 |
|
Czech Repub |
4 |
| United Kingdom |
133 |
|
Estonia |
4 |
| Canada |
110 |
|
New Zealand |
4 |
| Sweden |
86 |
|
Argentina |
3 |
| Netherlands |
70 |
|
Monaco |
3 |
| Denmark |
51 |
|
Nigeria |
3 |
| Japan |
51 |
|
Colombia |
2 |
| Portugal |
49 |
|
New Caledon |
2 |
| Norway |
48 |
|
Nicaragua |
2 |
| Australia |
35 |
|
Russia |
2 |
| Italy |
32 |
|
South Africa |
2 |
| Finland |
31 |
|
Venezuela |
2 |
| Belgium |
27 |
|
Bulgaria |
1 |
| Switzerland |
25 |
|
Guam |
1 |
| Austria |
23 |
|
Iceland |
1 |
| Brazil |
21 |
|
Latvia |
1 |
| Israel |
19 |
|
Malta |
1 |
| Mexico |
15 |
|
Philippines |
1 |
| Greece |
14 |
|
Senegal |
1 |
| Poland |
9 |
|
Taiwan ROC |
1 |
| Republic Of Korea |
9 |
|
Ukraine |
1 |
| Chile |
8 |
|
Uruguay |
1 |
*The numbers listed for each country are pre-registration
numbers as of 1 February 2005. |
|
|
|
|